¿Ü±¹µµ¼
´ëÇб³Àç/Àü¹®¼Àû
ÀÚ¿¬°úÇÐ ÀϹÝ
2013³â 9¿ù 9ÀÏ ÀÌÈÄ ´©Àû¼öÄ¡ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
Á¤°¡ |
28,500¿ø |
---|
23,000¿ø (19%ÇÒÀÎ)
230P (1%Àû¸³)
ÇÒÀÎÇýÅÃ | |
---|---|
Àû¸³ÇýÅà |
|
|
|
Ãß°¡ÇýÅÃ |
|
À̺¥Æ®/±âȹÀü
¿¬°üµµ¼
»óÇ°±Ç
ÀÌ»óÇ°ÀÇ ºÐ·ù
ÃâÆÇ»ç ¼Æò
¡°Sapolsky¡¯s decades of experience studying the effects of the interplay of genes and the environment on behavior shine brightly . . . He provides compelling examples that bad luck compounds . . . convincingly argues against claims that chaos theory, emergent phenomena, or the indeterminism offered by quantum mechanics provide the gap required for free will to exist.¡± ¡ªScience
¡°Few people understand the human brain as well as renowned neuroscientist Robert Sapolsky.¡± ¡ªMost Anticipated Fall Books, San Francisco Chronicle
¡°Determined is a sustained attempt at demonstrating that the decisions we make every day are products of complex factors of which we¡¯re not in charge . . . This is an amiable, surprisingly accessible and at times a persuasive book¡ªa paean to empathy and tolerance that yearns for a world in which societies eventually realize that retribution is futile and wrong . . . [Sapolsky] can be pleased with the knowledge that what he¡¯s written is stimulating to read, even for those who doubt his conclusions.¡± ¡ªSan Francisco Chronicle
¡°Sapolsky presents in his inimitable style a cogent argument explaining that free will is an illusion . . . Sapolsky tackles many complicated facets of this demanding subject with aplomb, making difficult material accessible. His engaging style and silly humor make learning fun . . . The debate is essential.¡± ¡ªBooklist
¡°A neuroscientific takedown of the notion that free will guides us . . . [Sapolsky] is fearless in taking on a matter that is fraught with a long history of debate and division, and he covers a wide variety of disciplines, from philosophy to ethics and law, with admirable clarity . . . Sure to stir controversy, which, to judge by this long but lucid exposition, the author is perfectly willing to court.¡± ¡ªKirkus (starred review)
º»¹®Áß¿¡¼
1
Turtles All the Way Down
When I was in college, my friends and I had an anecdote that we retold frequently; it went like this (and our retelling was so ritualistic that I suspect this is close to verbatim, forty-five years later):
So, it seems that William James was giving a lecture about the nature of life and the universe. Afterward, an old woman came up and said, "Professor James, you have it all wrong."
To which James asked, "How so, madam?"
"Things aren't at all like you said," she replied. "The world is on the back of a gigantic turtle."
"Hmm." said James, bemused. "That may be so, but where does that turtle stand?"
"On the back of another turtle," she answered.
"But madam," said James indulgently, "where does that turtle stand?"
To which the old woman responded triumphantly: "It's no use, Professor James. It's turtles all the way down!"
Oh, how we loved that story, always told it with the same intonation. We thought it made us seem droll and pithy and attractive.
We used the anecdote as mockery, a pejorative critique of someone clinging unshakably to illogic. We'd be in the dinner hall, and someone had said something nonsensical, where their response to being challenged had made things worse. Inevitably, one of us would smugly say, "It's no use, Professor James!" to which the person, who had heard our stupid anecdote repeatedly, would inevitably respond, "Screw you, just listen. This actually makes sense."
Here is the point of this book: While it may seem ridiculous and nonsensical to explain something by resorting to an infinity of turtles all the way down, it actually is much more ridiculous and nonsensical to believe that somewhere down there, there's a turtle floating in the air. The science of human behavior shows that turtles can't float; instead, it is indeed turtles all the way down.
Someone behaves in a particular way. Maybe it's wonderful and inspiring, maybe it's appalling, maybe it's in the eye of the beholder, or maybe just trivial. And we frequently ask the same basic question: Why did that behavior occur?
If you believe that turtles can float in the air, the answer is that it just happened, that there was no cause besides that person having simply decided to create that behavior. Science has recently provided a much more accurate answer, and when I say "recently," I mean in the last few centuries. The answer is that the behavior happened because something that preceded it caused it to happen. And why did that prior circumstance occur? Because something that preceded it caused it to happen. It's antecedent causes all the way down, not a floating turtle or causeless cause to be found. Or as Maria sings in The Sound of Music, "Nothing comes from nothing, nothing ever could."
To reiterate, when you behave in a particular way, which is to say when your brain has generated a particular behavior, it is because of the determinism that came just before, which was caused by the determinism just before that, and before that, all the way down. The approach of this book is to show how that determinism works, to explore how the biology over which you had no control, interacting with environment over which you had no control, made you you. And when people claim that there are causeless causes of your behavior that they call "free will," they have (a) failed to recognize or not learned about the determinism lurking beneath the surface and/or (b) erroneously concluded that the rarefied aspects of the universe that do work indeterministically can explain your character, morals, and behavior.
Once you work with the notion that every aspect of behavior has deterministic, prior causes, you observe a behavior and can answer why it occurred: as just noted, because of the action of neurons in this or that part of your brain in the preceding second. And in the seconds to minutes before, those neurons were activated by a thought, a memory, an emotion, or sensory stimuli. And in the hours to days before that behavior occurred, the hormones in your circulation shaped those thoughts, memories, and emotions and altered how sensitive your brain was to particular environmental stimuli. And in the preceding months to years, experience and environment changed how those neurons function, causing some to sprout new connections and become more excitable, and causing the opposite in others.
And from there, we hurtle back decades in identifying antecedent causes. Explaining why that behavior occurred requires recognizing how during your adolescence a key brain region was still being constructed, shaped by socialization and acculturation. Further back, there's childhood experience shaping the construction of your brain, with the same then applying to your fetal environment. Moving further back, we have to factor in the genes you inherited and their effects on behavior.
But we're not done yet. That's because everything in your childhood, starting with how you were mothered within minutes of birth, was influenced by culture, which means as well by the centuries of ecological factors that influenced what kind of culture your ancestors invented, and by the evolutionary pressures that molded the species you belong to. Why did that behavior occur? Because of biological and environmental interactions, all the way down.
As a central point of this book, those are all variables that you had little or no control over. You cannot decide all the sensory stimuli in your environment, your hormone levels this morning, whether something traumatic happened to you in the past, the socioeconomic status of your parents, your fetal environment, your genes, whether your ancestors were farmers or herders. Let me state this most broadly, probably at this point too broadly for most readers: we are nothing more or less than the cumulative biological and environmental luck, over which we had no control, that has brought us to any moment. You're going to be able to recite this sentence in your irritated sleep by the time we're done.
There are all sorts of aspects about behavior that, while true, are not relevant to where we're heading. For example, the fact that some criminal behavior can be due to psychiatric or neurological problems. That some kids have "learning differences" because of the way their brains work. That some people have trouble with self-restraint, because they grew up without any decent role models or because they're still a teenager with a teenager's brain. That someone has said something hurtful merely because they're tired and stressed, or even because of a medication they're taking.
All of these are circumstances where we recognize that sometimes, biology can impinge on our behavior. This is essentially a nice humane agenda that endorses society's general views about agency and personal responsibility but reminds you to make exceptions for edge cases: judges should consider mitigating factors in criminals' upbringing during sentencing; juvenile murderers shouldn't be executed; the teacher handing out gold stars to the kids who are soaring in learning to read should do something special too for that kid with dyslexia; college admissions officers should consider more than just SAT cutoffs for applicants who have overcome unique challenges.
These are good, sensible ideas that should be instituted if you decide that some people have much less self-control and capacity to freely choose their actions than average, and that at times, we all have much less than we imagine.
We can all agree on that; however, we're heading into very different terrain, one that I suspect most readers will not agree with, which is deciding that we have no free will at all. Here would be some of the logical implications of that being the case: That there can be no such thing as blame, and that punishment as retribution is indefensible-sure, keep dangerous people from damaging others, but do so as straightforwardly and nonjudgmentally as keeping a car with faulty brakes off the
Ã¥¼Ò°³
The instant New York Times bestseller!
One of our great behavioral scientists, the bestselling author of Behave, plumbs the depths of the science and philosophy of decision-making to mount a devastating case against free will, an argument with profound consequences
Robert Sapolsky¡¯s Behave, his now classic account of why humans do good and why they do bad, pointed toward an unsettling conclusion: We may not grasp the precise marriage of nature and nurture that creates the physics and chemistry at the base of human behavior, but that doesn¡¯t mean it doesn¡¯t exist. Now, in Determined, Sapolsky takes his argument all the way, mounting a brilliant (and in his inimitable way, delightful) full-frontal assault on the pleasant fantasy that there is some separate self telling our biology what to do.
Determined offers a marvelous synthesis of what we know about how consciousness works¡ªthe tight weave between reason and emotion and between stimulus and response in the moment and over a life. One by one, Sapolsky tackles all the major arguments for free will and takes them out, cutting a path through the thickets of chaos and complexity science and quantum physics, as well as touching ground on some of the wilder shores of philosophy. He shows us that the history of medicine is in no small part the history of learning that fewer and fewer things are somebody¡¯s ¡°fault¡±; for example, for centuries we thought seizures were a sign of demonic possession.
Yet, as he acknowledges, it¡¯s very hard, and at times impossible, to uncouple from our zeal to judge others and to judge ourselves. Sapolsky applies the new understanding of life beyond free will to some of our most essential questions around punishment, morality, and living well together. By the end, Sapolsky argues that while living our daily lives recognizing that we have no free will is going to be monumentally difficult, doing so is not going to result in anarchy, pointlessness, and existential malaise. Instead, it will make for a much more humane world.
°ü·ÃÀ̹ÌÁö
ÀúÀÚ¼Ò°³
»ý³â¿ùÀÏ | - |
---|
ÇϹöµå´ëÇб³¿¡¼ »ý¹°ÀηùÇÐÀ» Àü°øÇÑ ÈÄ ·ÏÆç·¯´ëÇб³¿¡¼ ½Å°æ³»ºÐºñÇÐÀ¸·Î ¹Ú»çÇÐÀ§¸¦ ¹Þ¾Ò´Ù. ÇöÀç ½ºÅÄÆÛµå´ëÇб³ »ý¹°Çаú ¹× ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ½Å°æÇаú ±³¼ö·Î ÀçÁ÷ÁßÀ̸ç, Àΰ£À» ºñ·ÔÇØ ¿µÀå·ùÀÇ ½ºÆ®·¹½º¸¦ ¿¬±¸ÇÏ´Â ¼¼°è ÃÖ°íÀÇ ½Å°æ°úÇÐÀÚ·Î Æò°¡¹Þ´Â´Ù. ½ºÆ®·¹½º°¡ ³úÀÇ Çظ¶¿¡ ÀÖ´Â ½Å°æ¼¼Æ÷¸¦ Æı«ÇÑ´Ù´Â »ç½ÇÀ» ¼¼°è ÃÖÃÊ·Î ÀÔÁõÇϸç Çа迡 Å« ¹ÝÇâÀ» ºÒ·¯ÀÏÀ¸Ä×´Ù. ¸Æ¾Æ´õ Àç´Ü°ú ¾ÙÇÁ¸®µå P. ½½·Ð Àç´Ü, ±¹¸³º¸°Ç¿ø µî ¼ö½Ê °÷ÀÇ Á¤ºÎ ±â°ü°ú ÀåÇÐÀç´ÜÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ ¿¬±¸ Áö¿øÀ» ¹Þ¾Ò´Ù. ¡´´º¿å ŸÀÓ½º¡µ°¡ ¡°Á¦ÀÎ ±¸´Þ¿¡ Äڹ̵ð¾ðÀ» ¼¯À¸¸é, »õÆú½ºÅ°Ã³·³ ±ÛÀ» ¾µ °Í¡±À̶ó°í ÇßÀ» ¸¸Å, ÅåÅå Æ¢´Â À¯¸Ó·Î ¹«ÀåÇÑ ±íÀÌ ÀÖ´Â ±Û¾²±â·Î À¯¸íÇÏ´Ù. ½Å°æÀÇÇÐÀÚÀÌÀÚ º£½ºÆ®¼¿·¯ ÀÛ°¡ÀÎ ¿Ã¸®¹ö »ö½º´Â »õÆú½ºÅ°¸¦ ¡°¿ì¸® ½Ã´ë ÃÖ°íÀÇ °úÇÐ Àú¼ú°¡ Áß ÇÑ ¸í¡±À̶ó°í ÆòÇϱ⵵ Çß´Ù. ¡º´º¿äÄ¿¡» ¡º»çÀ̾ðƼÇÈ ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä¡» ¡ºµð½ºÄ¿¹ö¡» µî¿¡ ±ÛÀ» ±â°íÇß°í, ¡º¸ðµç °ÍÀº °áÁ¤µÇ¾î ÀÖ´Ù(Determined)¡»(±Ù°£) ¡º½ºÆ®·¹½º¡» ¡ºDr. ¿µÀå·ù °³ÄÚ¿ø¼þÀÌ·Î »ì´Ù¡» µî ¿©·¯ ±ÇÀÇ °úÇм¸¦ ½è´Ù.
ÆîÃ帱âÁÖ°£·©Å·
´õº¸±â»óÇ°Á¤º¸Á¦°ø°í½Ã
À̺¥Æ® ±âȹÀü
´ëÇб³Àç/Àü¹®¼Àû ºÐ¾ß¿¡¼ ¸¹Àº ȸ¿øÀÌ ±¸¸ÅÇÑ Ã¥
ÆǸÅÀÚÁ¤º¸
»óÈ£ |
(ÁÖ)±³º¸¹®°í |
---|---|
´ëÇ¥ÀÚ¸í |
¾Èº´Çö |
»ç¾÷ÀÚµî·Ï¹øÈ£ |
102-81-11670 |
¿¬¶ôó |
1544-1900 |
ÀüÀÚ¿ìÆíÁÖ¼Ò |
callcenter@kyobobook.co.kr |
Åë½ÅÆǸž÷½Å°í¹øÈ£ |
01-0653 |
¿µ¾÷¼ÒÀçÁö |
¼¿ïƯº°½Ã Á¾·Î±¸ Á¾·Î 1(Á¾·Î1°¡,±³º¸ºôµù) |
±³È¯/ȯºÒ
¹ÝÇ°/±³È¯ ¹æ¹ý |
¡®¸¶ÀÌÆäÀÌÁö > Ãë¼Ò/¹ÝÇ°/±³È¯/ȯºÒ¡¯ ¿¡¼ ½Åû ¶Ç´Â 1:1 ¹®ÀÇ °Ô½ÃÆÇ ¹× °í°´¼¾ÅÍ(1577-2555)¿¡¼ ½Åû °¡´É |
---|---|
¹ÝÇ°/±³È¯°¡´É ±â°£ |
º¯½É ¹ÝÇ°ÀÇ °æ¿ì Ãâ°í¿Ï·á ÈÄ 6ÀÏ(¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ) À̳»±îÁö¸¸ °¡´É |
¹ÝÇ°/±³È¯ ºñ¿ë |
º¯½É ȤÀº ±¸¸ÅÂø¿À·Î ÀÎÇÑ ¹ÝÇ°/±³È¯Àº ¹Ý¼Û·á °í°´ ºÎ´ã |
¹ÝÇ°/±³È¯ ºÒ°¡ »çÀ¯ |
·¼ÒºñÀÚÀÇ Ã¥ÀÓ ÀÖ´Â »çÀ¯·Î »óÇ° µîÀÌ ¼Õ½Ç ¶Ç´Â ÈÑ¼ÕµÈ °æ¿ì ·¼ÒºñÀÚÀÇ »ç¿ë, Æ÷Àå °³ºÀ¿¡ ÀÇÇØ »óÇ° µîÀÇ °¡Ä¡°¡ ÇöÀúÈ÷ °¨¼ÒÇÑ °æ¿ì ·º¹Á¦°¡ °¡´ÉÇÑ »óÇ° µîÀÇ Æ÷ÀåÀ» ÈѼÕÇÑ °æ¿ì ·½Ã°£ÀÇ °æ°ú¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ÀçÆǸŰ¡ °ï¶õÇÑ Á¤µµ·Î °¡Ä¡°¡ ÇöÀúÈ÷ °¨¼ÒÇÑ °æ¿ì ·ÀüÀÚ»ó°Å·¡ µî¿¡¼ÀÇ ¼ÒºñÀÚº¸È£¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·üÀÌ Á¤ÇÏ´Â ¼ÒºñÀÚ Ã»¾àöȸ Á¦ÇÑ ³»¿ë¿¡ ÇØ´çµÇ´Â °æ¿ì |
»óÇ° Ç°Àý |
°ø±Þ»ç(ÃâÆÇ»ç) Àç°í »çÁ¤¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Ç°Àý/Áö¿¬µÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ½ |
¼ÒºñÀÚ ÇÇÇغ¸»ó |
·»óÇ°ÀÇ ºÒ·®¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ±³È¯, A/S, ȯºÒ, Ç°Áúº¸Áõ ¹× ÇÇÇغ¸»ó µî¿¡ °üÇÑ »çÇ×Àº¼ÒºñÀÚºÐÀïÇØ°á ±âÁØ (°øÁ¤°Å·¡À§¿øȸ °í½Ã)¿¡ ÁØÇÏ¿© ó¸®µÊ ·´ë±Ý ȯºÒ ¹× ȯºÒÁö¿¬¿¡ µû¸¥ ¹è»ó±Ý Áö±Þ Á¶°Ç, ÀýÂ÷ µîÀº ÀüÀÚ»ó°Å·¡ µî¿¡¼ÀǼҺñÀÚ º¸È£¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·ü¿¡ µû¶ó ó¸®ÇÔ |
¹è¼Û¾È³»
±³º¸¹®°í »óÇ°Àº Åùè·Î ¹è¼ÛµÇ¸ç, Ãâ°í¿Ï·á 1~2Àϳ» »óÇ°À» ¹Þ¾Æ º¸½Ç ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
Ãâ°í°¡´É ½Ã°£ÀÌ ¼·Î ´Ù¸¥ »óÇ°À» ÇÔ²² ÁÖ¹®ÇÒ °æ¿ì Ãâ°í°¡´É ½Ã°£ÀÌ °¡Àå ±ä »óÇ°À» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ¹è¼ÛµË´Ï´Ù.
±ººÎ´ë, ±³µµ¼Ò µî ƯÁ¤±â°üÀº ¿ìü±¹ Åù踸 ¹è¼Û°¡´ÉÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
¹è¼Ûºñ´Â ¾÷ü ¹è¼Ûºñ Á¤Ã¥¿¡ µû¸¨´Ï´Ù.