추가 적립 안내

1964년에 설립된 사단법인 세계국제법협회 한국본부(Korean Branch of the International Law Association)는 『Korean Yearbook of International Law. 6(2018)』를 발간했다. 한국국제법연감은 국제법과 관련된 우리나라의 실행을 정리하고 외교적 쟁점에 대한 해석과 이론적 논의를 담고 있는 점에서, 학술적 논의를 중심으로 하는 기존의 저널과는 정체성과 기능 면에서 성격을 크게 달리한다.

EDITOR-IN-CHIEF'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
CHOI Seung-Hwan ＿ 13

EDITORIAL NOTE
LEE Seryon ＿ 17

ARTICLES
LEE Seok-Yong
Revisiting the Regime of Maritime Features in International Law of the Sea and ＿ 23
Its Implications for Korea

CHOI Seung-Hwan
The Illegality of China’s Economic Retaliation for the Republic of Korea’s ＿ 63
Deployment of the THAAD System under General International Law

SUNG Jae-Ho·YOO Jun-Koo
A Supplementary Consideration of Professor Schrijver’s Study on the ICJ’s ＿ 81
Precedents Related to Sovereignty over Disputed Islands and the Study of Dokdo

LEE Gyoo-Ho
Lessons from Investor-State Dispute Settlements Related to Korea or ＿ 111
Korean Investors

DOH See-Hwan
International Human Rights Legal Challenges to Solve Japanese Military ＿ 171
‘Comfort Women’ Issue

SPECIAL CONTRIBUTION
Carlos Esplugues
The Establishment of Screening Systems of Foreign Directive Investment ＿ 193
on National Security Grounds: A South Korean Perspective

SPECIAL REPORTS
LEE Jang-Hie
The Distortion of History regarding the Dokdo Territory in Japanese History ＿ 233
Textbook and the Truth under International Law & History

LEE Whie-Jin
The Interpretation of Human Rights Treaties in the Korean Courts with ＿ 265
Reference to the Issue of Conscientious Objection to Military Service

CHUNG Min-Jung
The National Assembly’s Role in Denuclearizing North Korea and ＿ 281
Resuming South-North Korean Economic Cooperation:
Legislative Consent to the Conclusion of the South-North Korean Agreement

KIM Young-Seok
Adoption of Judicial Insolvency Network Guidelines by Seoul Bankruptcy Court ＿ 295
and Follow-ups

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
OH Sun-Young
How Did We Get Here: The Chronology of THADD Deployment ＿ 307

CHUNG Min-Jung
International Law-Related Resolutions of the 20th National Assembly with ＿ 313
a Focus on Territorial Sovereignty and International Environmental Law

KANG Sung-Jin
Recent WTO Disputes and Related Issues Involving Korea ＿ 319

CONTEMPORARY PRACTICE AND JUDICIAL DECISIONS
LEE Keun-Gwan
Judicial Decisions in Public International Law (2018) ＿ 327

JANG Ji-Yong
Judicial Decisions in Private International Law (2018) ＿ 355

The Editorial Board
Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone Act ＿ 379

Adjustment of International Taxes Act ＿ 387

Act on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials ＿ 461
in International Business Transactions

Treaties/Agreements Concluded by the Republic of Korea ＿ 467

INDEX ＿ 475
AUTHOR GUIDELINES AND STYLE SHEET ＿ 481

[서문]
The year 2019 is a meaningful year in the sense that this year is the 100th anniversary since the establishment of the Korean Provisionary Government, and the 74th anniversary since the independence of the Korean peninsula from the Japanese occupation of Korea. Commemorating the 100th anniversary of the Independence Movement on May 1st 1919, MOON Jae-In, the president of the Republic of Korea(ROK), characterized the new order for the coming 100 years, as the New Korean Peninsula Regime, and officially committed to promote the Peace-Cooperation Community and the Economy-Cooperation Community together with North Korea.
With a view to establishing sustainable peace and prosperity in the Korean peninsula, it is very important for political leaders to make a definite decision to settle peacefully international disputes and problems that have occurred in East Asia in accordance with international law and justice. Judging from current international circumstances surrounding the Korean peninsula, there is, unfortunately, an increasing tendency of prioritizing the expansion of national interests by the use or threat or the use of power and economic coercion, rather than pursuing dispute settlement under international law and mutual cooperation.
For the successful launching of the Peace and Prosperity Community in East Asia, it is indispensable for the East Asian countries to restore and maintain political credibility, especially among Japan, the ROK, and China. However, the recent increase of tension caused by the development of nuclear weapons by North Korea, together with territorial disputes, and the energy and security crisis prevalent in North-East Asia, have cast a cloud over the prospect of the development of the Peace and Prosperity Community in East Asia. It should be noted that France and Germany established the EEC and developed the EU, the peace and prosperity community, with the help of other European countries, by establishing reconciliation and credibility, despite the deep-rooted antagonistic relationship that had accumulated through the two World Wars. Is it impossible for East Asian countries to build this kind of peace and prosperity community in East Asia?
With a view to establishing sustainable peace and prosperity in East Asia filled with deep-rooted historical discord, wise and definite decisions are called upon to utilize various pending issues and problems as a catalyzer for reconciliation and cooperation, not for discord and antagonism. If we do not first empty the dish full of discord and antagonism, reconciliation and cooperation cannot be poured into it. If we do not unfold our hands that are filled with distrust and hegemony, we will not be able to catch peace and prosperity.
In this context, the role of experts on international law is much more significant than ever before for the maintenance of sustainable peace and prosperity in East Asia. I hope that the articles and essays having been contributed to KYIL contribute to the development of sustainable peace and prosperity in East Asia by providing effective and useful solutions based on rule of law and oriental wisdom.
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to all the authors who contributed valuable articles and special reports including useful remarks and documents regarding recent developments and the ROK’s practices on the interpretation and application of international law, as well as my colleagues on the editorial board, especially Professor LEE Seryon, the Executive Editor, for her dedicated work on editing Volume 6, KYIL. I also appreciate Professor LEE Jang- Hie, the former Editor-in-Chief who contributed his sincere efforts to the compilation of five volumes of KYIL (from V. 1 to V. 5). Finally, I would like to thank staff editors and Dr. SEO Jin-Woong, the Secretary of the Korean Branch, ILA, for their heartful assistance in publishing this volume.

CHOI Seung-Hwan
KYIL Editor-in-Chief