°£Æí°áÁ¦, ½Å¿ëÄ«µå û±¸ÇÒÀÎ
ÀÎÅÍÆÄÅ© ·Ôµ¥Ä«µå 5% (6,160¿ø)
(ÃÖ´ëÇÒÀÎ 10¸¸¿ø / Àü¿ù½ÇÀû 40¸¸¿ø)
ºÏÇǴϾð ·Ôµ¥Ä«µå 30% (4,540¿ø)
(ÃÖ´ëÇÒÀÎ 3¸¸¿ø / 3¸¸¿ø ÀÌ»ó °áÁ¦)
NH¼îÇÎ&ÀÎÅÍÆÄÅ©Ä«µå 20% (5,190¿ø)
(ÃÖ´ëÇÒÀÎ 4¸¸¿ø / 2¸¸¿ø ÀÌ»ó °áÁ¦)
Close

The Origin of Species: 150th Anniversary Edition (Anniversary)

¼Òµæ°øÁ¦

2013³â 9¿ù 9ÀÏ ÀÌÈÄ ´©Àû¼öÄ¡ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÆǸÅÁö¼ö 10
?
ÆǸÅÁö¼ö¶õ?
»çÀÌÆ®ÀÇ ÆǸŷ®¿¡ ±â¹ÝÇÏ¿© ÆǸŷ® ÃßÀ̸¦ ¹Ý¿µÇÑ ÀÎÅÍÆÄÅ© µµ¼­¿¡¼­ÀÇ µ¶¸³ÀûÀÎ ÆǸŠÁö¼öÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÇöÀç °¡Àå Àß Æȸ®´Â »óÇ°¿¡ °¡ÁßÄ¡¸¦ µÎ¾ú±â ¶§¹®¿¡ ½ÇÁ¦ ´©Àû ÆǸŷ®°ú´Â ´Ù¼Ò Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ÀÖÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÆǸŷ® ¿Ü¿¡µµ ´Ù¾çÇÑ °¡ÁßÄ¡·Î ±¸¼ºµÇ¾î ÃÖ±ÙÀÇ À̽´µµ¼­ È®Àνà À¯¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÇØ´ç Áö¼ö´Â ¸ÅÀÏ °»½ÅµË´Ï´Ù.
Close
°øÀ¯Çϱâ
Á¤°¡

9,000¿ø

  • 6,480¿ø (28%ÇÒÀÎ)

ÇÒÀÎÇýÅÃ
Àû¸³ÇýÅÃ
  • S-Point Àû¸³Àº ¸¶ÀÌÆäÀÌÁö¿¡¼­ Á÷Á¢ ±¸¸ÅÈ®Á¤ÇϽŠ°æ¿ì¸¸ Àû¸³ µË´Ï´Ù.
Ãß°¡ÇýÅÃ
¹è¼ÛÁ¤º¸
  • 3/19(È­) À̳» ¹ß¼Û ¿¹Á¤  (¼­¿ï½Ã °­³²±¸ »ï¼º·Î 512)
  • ¹è¼Ûºñ : 2,500¿ø
ÁÖ¹®¼ö·®
°¨¼Ò Áõ°¡
  • À̺¥Æ®/±âȹÀü

  • ¿¬°üµµ¼­(1)

  • »óÇ°±Ç

AD

ÃâÆÇ»ç ¼­Æò

¡°Next to the Bible no work has been quite as influential, in virtually every aspect of human thought, as The Origin of Species.¡±¡ªAshley Montagu

¡°Darwin was one of history¡¯s towering geniuses and ranks with the greatest heroes of man¡¯s intellectual progress.¡±¡ªGeorge Gaylord Simpson in The Meaning of Evolution

¡°It is clear that here is one of the most important contributions ever made to philosophic science; and it is at least behooving on scientists, in the light of the accumulation of evidence which the author has summoned in support of his theory, to reconsider the grounds on which their present doctrine of the origin of species is based.¡±¡ªThe New York Times

¡°Amazingly, 150 years after the publication of The Origin of Species, Darwin's seminal work on the theory of evolution remains the authoritative tract on the subject.¡±¡ªLibrary Journal

¸ñÂ÷

Introductionp. vii
Note on the Textp. xxix
Select Bibliographyp. xxx
A Chronology of Charles Darwinp. xxxi
The Origin of Speciesp. 1
Register of Writersp. 397
Glossaryp. 410
Indexp. 427
Table of Contents provided by Syndetics. All Rights Reserved.

º»¹®Áß¿¡¼­

Chapter One


Variation Under Domestication

Causes of Variability¡ªEffects of Habit¡ªCorrelation of Growth¡ªInheritance¡ªCharacter of Domestic Varieties¡ªDifficulty of distinguishing between Varieties and Species¡ªOrigin of Domestic Varieties from one or more Species¡ªDomestic Pigeons, their Differences and Origin¡ªPrinciple of Selection anciently followed, its Effects¡ªMethodical and Unconscious Selection¡ªUnknown Origin of our Domestic Productions¡ªCircumstances favourable to Man's power of Selection


WHEN WE look to the individuals of the same variety or sub-variety of our older cultivated plants and animals, one of the first points which strikes us, is, that they generally differ much more from each other, than do the individuals of any one species or variety in a state of nature. When we reflect on the vast diversity of the plants and animals which have been cultivated, and which have varied during all ages under the most different climates and treatment, I think we are driven to conclude that this greater variability is simply due to our domestic productions having been raised under conditions of life not so uniform as, and somewhat different from, those to which the parent species have been exposed under nature. There is, also, I think, some probability in the view propounded by Andrew Knight, that this variability may be partly connected with excess of food. It seems pretty clear that organic beings must be exposed during several generations to the new conditions of life to cause any appreciable amount of variation; and that when the organisation has once begun to vary, it generally continues to vary for many generations. No case is on record of a variable being ceasing to be variable under cultivation. Our oldest cultivated plants, such as wheat, still often yield new varieties: our oldest domesticated animals are still capable of rapid improvement or modification.
It has been disputed at what period of life the causes of variability, whatever they may be, generally act; whether during the early or late period of development of the embryo, or at the instant of conception. Geoffroy St Hilaire's experiments show that unnatural treatment of the embryo causes monstrosities; and monstrosities cannot be separated by any clear line of distinction from mere variations. But I am strongly inclined to suspect that the most frequent cause of variability may be attributed to the male and female reproductive elements having been affected prior to the act of conception. Several reasons make me believe in this; but the chief one is the remarkable effect which confinement or cultivation has on the functions of the reproductive system; this system appearing to be far more susceptible than any other part of the organization, to the action of any change in the conditions of life. Nothing is more easy than to tame an animal, and few things more difficult than to get it to breed freely under confinement, even in the many cases when the male and female unite. How many animals there are which will not breed, though living long under not very close confinement in their native country! This is generally attributed to vitiated instincts; but how many cultivated plants display the utmost vigour, and yet rarely or never seed! In some few such cases it has been found out that very trifling changes, such as a little more or less water at some particular period of growth, will determine whether or not the plant sets a seed. I cannot here enter on the copious details which I have collected on this curious subject; but to show how singular the laws are which determine the reproduction of animals under confinement, I may just mention that carnivorous animals, even from the tropics, breed in this country pretty freely under confinement, with the exception of the plantigrades or bear family; whereas, carnivorous birds, with the rarest exceptions, hardly ever lay fertile eggs. Many exotic plants have pollen utterly worthless, in the same exact condition as in the most sterile hybrids. When, on the one hand, we see domesticated animals and plants, though often weak and sickly, yet breeding quite freely under confinement; and when, on the other hand, we see individuals, though taken young from a state of nature, perfectly tamed, long-lived, and healthy (of which I could give numerous instances), yet having their reproductive system so seriously affected by unperceived causes as to fail in acting, we need not be surprised at this system, when it does act under confinement, acting not quite regularly, and producing offspring not perfectly like their parents or variable.

Sterility has been said to be the bane of horticulture; but on this view we owe variability to the same cause which produces sterility; and variability is the source of all the choicest productions of the garden. I may add, that as some organisms will breed most freely under the most unnatural conditions (for instance, the rabbit and ferret kept in hutches), showing that their reproductive system has not been thus affected; so will some animals and plants withstand domestication or cultivation, and vary very slightly¡ªperhaps hardly more than in a state of nature.

A long list could easily be given of 'sporting plants;' by this term gardeners mean a single bud or offset, which suddenly assumes a new and sometimes very different character from that of the rest of the plant. Such buds can be propagated by grafting, &c., and sometimes by seed. These 'sports' are extremely rare under nature, but far from rare under cultivation; and in this case we see that the treatment of the parent has affected a bud or offset, and not the ovules or pollen. But it is the opinion of most physiologists that there is no essential difference between a bud and an ovule in their earliest stages of formation; so that, in fact, 'sports' support my view, that variability may be largely attributed to the ovules or pollen, or to both, having been affected by the treatment of the parent prior to the act of conception. These cases anyhow show that variation is not necessarily connected, as some authors have supposed, with the act of generation.

Seedlings from the same fruit, and the young of the same litter, sometimes differ considerably from each other, though both the young and the parents, as Mxller has remarked, have apparently been exposed to exactly the same conditions of life; and this shows how unimportant the direct effects of the conditions of life are in comparison with the laws of reproduction, and of growth, and of inheritance; for had the action of the conditions been direct, if any of the young had varied, all would probably have varied in the same manner. To judge how much, in the case of any variation, we should attribute to the direct action of heat, moisture, light, food, &c., is most difficult: my impression is, that with animals such agencies have produced very little direct effect, though apparently more in the case of plants. Under this point of view, Mr Buckman's recent experiments on plants seem extremely valuable. When all or nearly all the individuals exposed to certain conditions are affected in the same way, the change at first appears to be directly due to such conditions; but in some cases it can be shown that quite opposite conditions produce similar changes of structure. Nevertheless some slight amount of change may, I think, be attributed to the direct action of the conditions of life¡ªas, in some cases, increased size from amount of food, colour from particular kinds of food and from light, and perhaps the thickness of fur from climate.

Habit also has a deciding influence, as in the period of flowering with plants when transported from one climate to another. In animals it has a more marked effect; for instance, I find in the domestic duck that the bones of the wing weigh less and the bones of the leg more, in proportion to the whole skeleton, than do the same bones in the wild-duck; and I presume that this change may b

Ã¥¼Ò°³

Charles Darwin¡¯s classic that exploded into public controversy, revolutionized the course of science, and continues to transform our views of the world.

Origin of Species is still one of the most controversial works of science and it is one of the most outstanding works of science in the 19th century. The studies made by Darwin during the voyage of the HMS Beagle form a large part of the basis for this work.

As early as 1837, Darwin's notes describe the transmutation (evolution) of species. The work on this proceeded in private -- available for discussion with only a few close friends -- for the next twenty-two years. Darwin recognized how controversial it would be once published.

The ideas were presented, along with the parallel concepts by Alfred Wallace, in 1958 and published as the Origin of Species in 1859.




--- FROM THE PUBLISHER

ÀúÀÚ¼Ò°³

Darwin, Charles/ Huxley, Julian (INT) [Àú] ½ÅÀ۾˸² SMS½Åû
»ý³â¿ùÀÏ -

ÇØ´çÀÛ°¡¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼Ò°³°¡ ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.

´ëÇб³Àç/Àü¹®¼­Àû ºÐ¾ß¿¡¼­ ¸¹Àº ȸ¿øÀÌ ±¸¸ÅÇÑ Ã¥

    ¸®ºä

    0.0 (ÃÑ 0°Ç)

    100ÀÚÆò

    ÀÛ¼º½Ã À¯ÀÇ»çÇ×

    ÆòÁ¡
    0/100ÀÚ
    µî·ÏÇϱâ

    100ÀÚÆò

    10.0
    (ÃÑ 0°Ç)

    ÆǸÅÀÚÁ¤º¸

    • ÀÎÅÍÆÄÅ©µµ¼­¿¡ µî·ÏµÈ ¿ÀǸ¶ÄÏ »óÇ°Àº ±× ³»¿ë°ú Ã¥ÀÓÀÌ ¸ðµÎ ÆǸÅÀÚ¿¡°Ô ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÀÎÅÍÆÄÅ©µµ¼­´Â ÇØ´ç »óÇ°°ú ³»¿ë¿¡ ´ëÇØ Ã¥ÀÓÁöÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù.

    »óÈ£

    (ÁÖ)±³º¸¹®°í

    ´ëÇ¥ÀÚ¸í

    ¾Èº´Çö

    »ç¾÷ÀÚµî·Ï¹øÈ£

    102-81-11670

    ¿¬¶ôó

    1544-1900

    ÀüÀÚ¿ìÆíÁÖ¼Ò

    callcenter@kyobobook.co.kr

    Åë½ÅÆǸž÷½Å°í¹øÈ£

    01-0653

    ¿µ¾÷¼ÒÀçÁö

    ¼­¿ïƯº°½Ã Á¾·Î±¸ Á¾·Î 1(Á¾·Î1°¡,±³º¸ºôµù)

    ±³È¯/ȯºÒ

    ¹ÝÇ°/±³È¯ ¹æ¹ý

    ¡®¸¶ÀÌÆäÀÌÁö > Ãë¼Ò/¹ÝÇ°/±³È¯/ȯºÒ¡¯ ¿¡¼­ ½Åû ¶Ç´Â 1:1 ¹®ÀÇ °Ô½ÃÆÇ ¹× °í°´¼¾ÅÍ(1577-2555)¿¡¼­ ½Åû °¡´É

    ¹ÝÇ°/±³È¯°¡´É ±â°£

    º¯½É ¹ÝÇ°ÀÇ °æ¿ì Ãâ°í¿Ï·á ÈÄ 6ÀÏ(¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ) À̳»±îÁö¸¸ °¡´É
    ´Ü, »óÇ°ÀÇ °áÇÔ ¹× °è¾à³»¿ë°ú ´Ù¸¦ °æ¿ì ¹®Á¦Á¡ ¹ß°ß ÈÄ 30ÀÏ À̳»

    ¹ÝÇ°/±³È¯ ºñ¿ë

    º¯½É ȤÀº ±¸¸ÅÂø¿À·Î ÀÎÇÑ ¹ÝÇ°/±³È¯Àº ¹Ý¼Û·á °í°´ ºÎ´ã
    »óÇ°À̳ª ¼­ºñ½º ÀÚüÀÇ ÇÏÀÚ·Î ÀÎÇÑ ±³È¯/¹ÝÇ°Àº ¹Ý¼Û·á ÆǸÅÀÚ ºÎ´ã

    ¹ÝÇ°/±³È¯ ºÒ°¡ »çÀ¯

    ·¼ÒºñÀÚÀÇ Ã¥ÀÓ ÀÖ´Â »çÀ¯·Î »óÇ° µîÀÌ ¼Õ½Ç ¶Ç´Â ÈÑ¼ÕµÈ °æ¿ì
    (´ÜÁö È®ÀÎÀ» À§ÇÑ Æ÷Àå ÈѼÕÀº Á¦¿Ü)

    ·¼ÒºñÀÚÀÇ »ç¿ë, Æ÷Àå °³ºÀ¿¡ ÀÇÇØ »óÇ° µîÀÇ °¡Ä¡°¡ ÇöÀúÈ÷ °¨¼ÒÇÑ °æ¿ì
    ¿¹) È­ÀåÇ°, ½ÄÇ°, °¡ÀüÁ¦Ç°(¾Ç¼¼¼­¸® Æ÷ÇÔ) µî

    ·º¹Á¦°¡ °¡´ÉÇÑ »óÇ° µîÀÇ Æ÷ÀåÀ» ÈѼÕÇÑ °æ¿ì
    ¿¹) À½¹Ý/DVD/ºñµð¿À, ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î, ¸¸È­Ã¥, ÀâÁö, ¿µ»ó È­º¸Áý

    ·½Ã°£ÀÇ °æ°ú¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ÀçÆǸŰ¡ °ï¶õÇÑ Á¤µµ·Î °¡Ä¡°¡ ÇöÀúÈ÷ °¨¼ÒÇÑ °æ¿ì

    ·ÀüÀÚ»ó°Å·¡ µî¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¼ÒºñÀÚº¸È£¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·üÀÌ Á¤ÇÏ´Â ¼ÒºñÀÚ Ã»¾àöȸ Á¦ÇÑ ³»¿ë¿¡ ÇØ´çµÇ´Â °æ¿ì

    »óÇ° Ç°Àý

    °ø±Þ»ç(ÃâÆÇ»ç) Àç°í »çÁ¤¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Ç°Àý/Áö¿¬µÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ½

    ¼ÒºñÀÚ ÇÇÇغ¸»ó
    ȯºÒÁö¿¬¿¡ µû¸¥ ¹è»ó

    ·»óÇ°ÀÇ ºÒ·®¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ±³È¯, A/S, ȯºÒ, Ç°Áúº¸Áõ ¹× ÇÇÇغ¸»ó µî¿¡ °üÇÑ »çÇ×Àº ¼ÒºñÀÚºÐÀïÇØ°á ±âÁØ (°øÁ¤°Å·¡À§¿øȸ °í½Ã)¿¡ ÁØÇÏ¿© 󸮵Ê

    ·´ë±Ý ȯºÒ ¹× ȯºÒÁö¿¬¿¡ µû¸¥ ¹è»ó±Ý Áö±Þ Á¶°Ç, ÀýÂ÷ µîÀº ÀüÀÚ»ó°Å·¡ µî¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¼ÒºñÀÚ º¸È£¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·ü¿¡ µû¶ó ó¸®ÇÔ

    (ÁÖ)KGÀ̴Ͻýº °áÁ¦´ë±Ý¿¹Ä¡¾÷ µî·Ï¹øÈ£: 02-006-00013

    (ÁÖ)ÀÎÅÍÆÄÅ©Ä¿¸Ó½º´Â ȸ¿ø´ÔµéÀÇ ¾ÈÀü°Å·¡¸¦ À§ÇØ ±¸¸Å±Ý¾×, °áÁ¦¼ö´Ü¿¡ »ó°ü¾øÀÌ (ÁÖ)ÀÎÅÍÆÄÅ©Ä¿¸Ó½º¸¦ ÅëÇÑ
    ¸ðµç °Å·¡¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© (ÁÖ)KGÀ̴Ͻýº°¡ Á¦°øÇÏ´Â ±¸¸Å¾ÈÀü¼­ºñ½º¸¦ Àû¿ëÇÏ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
    µî·Ï ¿©ºÎ´Â e-±ÝÀ¶¹Î¿ø¼¾ÅÍ È¨ÆäÀÌÁö(www.fcsc.kr)ÀÇ µî·Ï¡¤½Å°í>ÀüÀÚ±ÝÀ¶¾÷µî·ÏÇöȲ ¸Þ´º¿¡¼­ È®ÀÎÇÏ½Ç ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¼­ºñ½º °¡ÀÔ»ç½Ç È®ÀÎ

    ¹è¼Û¾È³»

    • ±³º¸¹®°í »óÇ°Àº Åùè·Î ¹è¼ÛµÇ¸ç, Ãâ°í¿Ï·á 1~2Àϳ» »óÇ°À» ¹Þ¾Æ º¸½Ç ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

    • Ãâ°í°¡´É ½Ã°£ÀÌ ¼­·Î ´Ù¸¥ »óÇ°À» ÇÔ²² ÁÖ¹®ÇÒ °æ¿ì Ãâ°í°¡´É ½Ã°£ÀÌ °¡Àå ±ä »óÇ°À» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ¹è¼ÛµË´Ï´Ù.

    • ±ººÎ´ë, ±³µµ¼Ò µî ƯÁ¤±â°üÀº ¿ìü±¹ Åù踸 ¹è¼Û°¡´ÉÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

    • ¹è¼Ûºñ´Â ¾÷ü ¹è¼Ûºñ Á¤Ã¥¿¡ µû¸¨´Ï´Ù.

    • - µµ¼­ ±¸¸Å ½Ã 15,000¿ø ÀÌ»ó ¹«·á¹è¼Û, 15,000¿ø ¹Ì¸¸ 2,500¿ø - »óÇ°º° ¹è¼Ûºñ°¡ ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ì, »óÇ°º° ¹è¼Ûºñ Á¤Ã¥ Àû¿ë