¸ñ·Ïº¸±â| Àüü(4)
 
 
 
 
ÀüÀÚ±âÇÐÃ¥ Áß ±¦ÂúÀº Ã¥  | ±âº» 2010.04.01 15:00:46

Æ®À§ÅÍ  ÁÖ¼Òº¹»ç


[ µµ¼­ ]
Wiley | 1986/07/24
ÆòÁ¡
»ó¼¼³»¿ëº¸±â | ¸®ºäº¸±â(1) | °ü·Ã Å׸¶º¸±â(0)
µî·ÏµÈ ±ÛÀÚ¼ö : 1111 ±ÛÀÚ
ÀÌ°ø°è³ª ÀÚ¿¬, °úÇдë ÇлýµéÀÌ ÀüÀÚ±âÇп¡ ´ëÇÑ
°³³äÀ» ÀÌÇØÇÏ°í ½ÀµæÇϴµ¥ ÁÁÀº Ã¥ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ü°èÀûÀÎ ¼³¸í°ú ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¿¹Á¦¸¦ ´Ù·ç°í À־
ÇлýµéÀÌ Á÷Á¢ ¹®Á¦¸¦ Ç®¾îº¸¸é¼­ ÇнÀÇØ ³ª°¡¸é µË´Ï´Ù.

½¬¿î ¿µ¾î·Î µÇ¾î À־ ÀбⰡ ¼ö¿ùÇÕ´Ï´Ù. 

This revised edition provides patient guidance in its clear and organized presentation of problems. It is rich in variety, large in number and provides very careful treatment of relativity. One outstanding feature is the inclusion of simple, standard examples demonstrated in different methods that will allow students to enhance and understand their calculating abilities. There are over 145 worked examples; virtually all of the standard problems are included. 

I believe there are basically two breeds in the world of EM textbooks. One is obviously J.D. Jackson and the other E.M. Purcell. If Griffiths follows Purcell's approach, I'd say Wangsness is in the style of Jackson (of course no direct comparison is possible, Jackson does not really discuss statics anyway).

Wangness is very much _detailed_ and provides ample examples, many of them kindly worked out. I am not sure if this book provides strong background in vector calculus, though. I always had troubles getting some geometrical intuitions. I guess I have learned more from Purcell in this respect.

Of course, there are many other great books such as Lorrain/Corson, Feynman volume 2 and such. Should be nice to look at those as well.







´ñ±Û(0) | ¿«Àα۾²±â(0) | ½ºÅ©·¦ ½Å°í | Àμâ
 
 
 
´ÙÀ½±Û : È­¸¦ ´Ù½º¸®´Â ¹ý  2010.04.01 15:07:25